5/30/2023 0 Comments Qupzilla system requirementsUnless there are more good suggestions on the Web Browser, any answers to the other parts of the Original Post (package list, etc). I did not know that they stopped updating Epiphany, that is to bad, it had a lot more potential than Chromium.Īnd there is still the option of using an extremely light weight browser with an alternate Youtube viewer (part of my original post question). Though I would still like to find some other options. Though Chromium is definitely off of the list, knowing the big announcement (few years ago) that Qt was updated for HW acceleration on the RPi in WebKit and QupZilla is actually light weight enough (better than the others thus far mentioned). I'm not trying to push you to Chromium, it's just that there isn't a lot of choice that fulfills all of your needs and is lightweight. Latest Version: Requirements: Windows 7 64 / Windows 8 64 / Windows 10 64 Author / Product: Falkon Team / Falkon Browser (64-bit) Old Versions: Filename. It's not maintained or updated anymore, all development has moved to Chromium. The HW acceleration is not as good on that. What is the browser that used to be included in Raspbian before they switched to Chromium? It had HW acceleration support and I would expect it to still be maintained and updated.Įpiphany, but it was very buggy and crashed frequently. Ok on the omxplayerGUI as well as on youtube-dl. Get youtube-dl, get the download link with -f best and run that link through omxplayer. There is Midori which is lightweight, or Dillo. If AntiX doesn't do it for ya, check out distros with OpenBox, FluxBox, and or IceWM desktops.like CrunchBang, SparkyLinux(?), SalentOS, etc.Kusti8 wrote:Nothing else has HW acceleration, but omxplayerGUI has a youtube player. And AntiX does a great job with "polish" of such a minimal distro, IMO. AntiX uses the Fluxbox or IceWM window managers and are significantly lighter on resources. Works on Windows Vista, 7, 8, 8.1 and 10. No personally identifiable information is collected. Stick with the main "AntiX" selections, not the "MX" selections, as the MX distro uses an XFCE desktop environment, which is actually slightly heavier than the LXDE in Lubuntu. Only your systems hardware and system software are evaluated. Based on your OP, and your hardware specs, I might suggest that AntiX is a better OS for that particular machine. Is there another distro better suited for your purposes? IMO.yes, but only YOU can answer that question, based on your needs and preferences. It will run, and maybe even run "fine", but it will become more and more restrained over time. I downloaded the latest that is pinned to OP, btw. I'm able to load up normal URLs, but SSL isn't working. Thank youI am a fan of Ubuntu, especially the LXDE desktop, but nearly every OS adds newer features over time, gradually increasing the software "draw" on system resources. I know this thread is old, but I was checking to see if there is anything I need to do to get SSL working on Qupzilla. Ok, so do you suggest? Is there any other distribution better suited for my purposes (preferably debian based)? Or is lubuntu the best? Regards.Ok, so do you suggest? Is there any other distribution better suited for my purposes (preferably debian based)? Or is lubuntu the best? File size: 62.8 MB Operating systems: Windows 11, 10, 8, 7, Linux. When running, the browser can require 104MB just to. Especially those that embed video files into the web page as advertising, I have found that some national newspaper web sites have more advertising than news content and that simply scrolling down the page becomes next to impossible on my machine even though I have twice the RAM, a dual core CPU and a video adapter with 1 GB video memory than you do. The first version of QupZilla was released in december 2010 and written in Python. Linux: PulseAudio streams now have QupZilla app name and icon sha256sum QupZilla-2.2.0.tar.xz 32cb6d4e5852781146ca5f1a1cf8e77da42a71fc096272e2030d83ea865c7818 Assets 6 nowrep v2.1.2 fc37057 Compare Version 2.1. The Ubuntu package for version 3.2 has a GTK interface and takes approximately 4MB of space on the disk. The effect that you are experiencing is down to the low capabilities of the video adapter and the very high expectation of certain web sites. It seems that the standard GUI installer requires more RAM during the installation process than the desktop & user interface requires after installation It will install the same Lubuntu desktop as in a standard Lubuntu ISO image. It does not install a text based version of Lubuntu. And so, it not only requires less RAM during installation but also works with less powerful video adapters. The usefulness of the Alternate ISO image comes from the fact that it uses a text based installer.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |